work of the us government造句

• For public domain works of the US Government that would be.
• File is certainly not a work of the US Government, as licensed.
• Unlike the works of the US government, this image is not in the public domain.
• :Works of the US government are in the PD, and are acceptable on Wikipedia.
• I have no idea whether work of the Dutch government is PD as work of the US government is.
• Unlike works of the US government, this is not public domain and will not be until 50 years have passed.
• The same seems to apply to Library of Congress Classification, despite that works of the US government are normally in the public domain.
• Even if the works are pre-1923 and works of the US government, this is still plagiarism if not a copyright infringement.
• The page is hosted by a US Government site, but the material doesn't appear to be a work of the US Government.
• License state image is the work of the US Government, but in fact the image is from a state-run non-profit.
• This image's copyright information is VERY doubtful, but it's possible that it's a work of the US government.
• :File : Lol key escrow . jpg has a copyright notice claiming it is a work of the US Government, but it is not.
• :: The rule about works of the US government is not arbitrary, but because by US copyright law any work of the US government is automatically public domain.
• :: The rule about works of the US government is not arbitrary, but because by US copyright law any work of the US government is automatically public domain.
• :: File : NoSarahPalin . jpg needs to be deleted, not the least of reasons being that it is claimed to be the work of the US government.
• :Material from the CIA Factbook is work of the US Government and should be tagged . " ( contribs ) 09 : 49, 3 March 2007 ( UTC)
• :: : : * Can you please point out the rational that all works stored in the LOC or US Archives with a reproduction number are works of the US government.
• The same wording is used for photos of US presidents and first ladies, even though these are clearly PD due to the fact that they're works of the US government.
• PS Copyright is not an issue here as the recording of this board meeting is a work of the US government . talk ) 18 : 38, 29 July 2015 ( UTC)
• Regarding : Image : Rosaparks _ 1964 . jpg, is it automatic to assume a photo listed at the LOC taken by the associated press of unknown copyright is a work of the US government?